Agatha Christie And Deception :: essays research papers

Deception is viewed as a negative term in society. However, in the genre of mystery novels, it is the essential key to its success. For the reader to want to continue on, he/she must be supplied with numerous possibilities for an ending. The only way one could provide such an abundant selection is with the use of deception. Agatha Christie has deceived her readers on purpose to present more plentiful probabilities for a conclusion. â€Å"No job is trickier or more critical than inventing ostensibly fair misdirection—that is, preserving some connection with plausibility while making many characters suspect. She (Agatha Christie) has perfected it.† (Wagoner, 2) Her skill has made her the most popular mystery author and now has over two billion books in print. She has also achieved Britain’s highest honor when she was made a Dame of the British Empire.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  And then there were None (Ten Little Indians) is the most popular novel written by Agatha Christie and is considered, by many, the greatest mystery novel ever written. In this acclaimed masterpiece of murder and suspense, Mr. Owen gathers ten strangers who share forgettable pasts together on an isolated Indian Island. However, the guests do not know the identity of their host. As they start telling their deepest, darkest secrets to each other, one by one, they start to die.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In this novel, deception is a significant part of the story. Agatha Christie misleads the reader by giving an impression that a mysterious, unknown figure has committed the heinous murders. Dr. Armstrong is one of the guests on the island and is suspicious about the homicides. He does not feel any of his fellow guests are to blame so he says, â€Å"You’re probably right! Damn it all, there must be someone hiding on the island! Ah! Here comes Lombard!† (Christie, none 68) By supplying a possible scenario, Christie has made the reader consider the possibility that it maybe true.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Further on in the novel, Christie hints about the identity of the alleged killer. Mr. Justice Wargrave is beginning to think that he can’t trust anyone on the island. He is starting to blame others including the very people who also have been attempting to solve the murders. In an abnormal, feverish tone he says, Its Armstrong†¦. I saw him looking at me sideways just then†¦. His eyes are mad†¦. Quite mad†¦. Perhaps he isn’t a doctor at all†¦. Agatha Christie And Deception :: essays research papers Deception is viewed as a negative term in society. However, in the genre of mystery novels, it is the essential key to its success. For the reader to want to continue on, he/she must be supplied with numerous possibilities for an ending. The only way one could provide such an abundant selection is with the use of deception. Agatha Christie has deceived her readers on purpose to present more plentiful probabilities for a conclusion. â€Å"No job is trickier or more critical than inventing ostensibly fair misdirection—that is, preserving some connection with plausibility while making many characters suspect. She (Agatha Christie) has perfected it.† (Wagoner, 2) Her skill has made her the most popular mystery author and now has over two billion books in print. She has also achieved Britain’s highest honor when she was made a Dame of the British Empire.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  And then there were None (Ten Little Indians) is the most popular novel written by Agatha Christie and is considered, by many, the greatest mystery novel ever written. In this acclaimed masterpiece of murder and suspense, Mr. Owen gathers ten strangers who share forgettable pasts together on an isolated Indian Island. However, the guests do not know the identity of their host. As they start telling their deepest, darkest secrets to each other, one by one, they start to die.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In this novel, deception is a significant part of the story. Agatha Christie misleads the reader by giving an impression that a mysterious, unknown figure has committed the heinous murders. Dr. Armstrong is one of the guests on the island and is suspicious about the homicides. He does not feel any of his fellow guests are to blame so he says, â€Å"You’re probably right! Damn it all, there must be someone hiding on the island! Ah! Here comes Lombard!† (Christie, none 68) By supplying a possible scenario, Christie has made the reader consider the possibility that it maybe true.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Further on in the novel, Christie hints about the identity of the alleged killer. Mr. Justice Wargrave is beginning to think that he can’t trust anyone on the island. He is starting to blame others including the very people who also have been attempting to solve the murders. In an abnormal, feverish tone he says, Its Armstrong†¦. I saw him looking at me sideways just then†¦. His eyes are mad†¦. Quite mad†¦. Perhaps he isn’t a doctor at all†¦.

Kelly Case Study Essay

1. According to Kelly, the most superordinate construct within Philip’s construct of clergy would most likely be that clergy members are direct representatives of God and that they carry out his will. Subordinate to this is the daily duties and sacrifices that clergy members must undertake, such as a vow of chastity and the spiritual guidance they must give to parishioners. Further subordinate to this construct is Philip’s perception that differences in views exist amongst clergy members, such as those who advocate reform within the church versus those who are more orthodox. 2. The two most evident and contrasting poles of Philip’s clergy construct could be the fact that Philip sees the church as a guiding, divine and spiritual entity, versus his view that it can also be restrictive and somewhat forbidding. This would apply to the dichotomy corollary, as it postulates that people use dichotomous poles of a construct to view the same thought in opposing (according to the person’s own personal viewpoint) ways. 3. Philip’s clergy construct is the same as that of others in the sense that both he and other clergy members feel the weight of their responsibilities and obligations to their followers. They can consequently talk with each other about these issues due to the common experiences shared by the clergy members, and therefore this applies to the commonality corollary. 4. Philip’s clergy construct is different from that of others in the sense that he disagrees with the views of members of the clergy who wish to reform certain practices of the church. Philip believes that the traditional methodologies of the church should continue to be followed, and he sees it as somewhat irrational and unbecoming that reformers would revoke what they were taught and swore to carry out. These differences in construction of events and beliefs would most closely apply to the individuality corollary. 5. According to Kelly, Philip’s clergy construct would most likely be considered fairly impermeable, due to his resistance to changes within the framework of how he envisions the church. This could be more commonly characterised as close-minded or perhaps â€Å"traditional†, as Philip’s construct of the church does not permit a wide range of convenience and is therefore resistant to including new elements (in this case, reform of  church practices). 6. The sociality corollary states that people, when playing a â€Å"role† in social situations, act in accordance with the expectations of others, and that the understanding of another person’s outlook and expectations is known as a â€Å"role construct†. An example of this in the case study could be the fact that Philip is aware when speaking to certain members of the public that he evokes a change in their behaviour due to his position as a priest. They make sure not to seem offensive or blasphemous in any way, and Philip is aware that they are acting differently than they normally would. In this case, the people altering their behaviour in Philip’s presence would be considered the role players, as they have a role construct about Philip due to his priesthood – likely that he is very couth and averse to any kind of potentially offensive or vulgar behaviour – and consequently adjust their mannerisms accordingly.

Nominal Definition and Examples

In English grammar, the term nominal is a category that describes the usage of parts of speech in a sentence. Specifically, the nominal definition is a noun, noun  phrase, or any word or word group that functions as a noun. It is also known as a  substantive.  The term comes from the Latin, meaning name.  Nominals can be the subject of a sentence, the object of a sentence, or the predicate nominative, which follows a linking verb and explains what the subject is. Nominals are used to give more specifics than a simple noun. Key Takeaways: Nominal Nominal is a grammatical category for words or groups of words that function as nouns in a sentence.Nominals can do whatever nouns can. They can be a subject, an object, or a predicate nominative.Nominal groups give more specifics about a noun.Nominal groups can contain other parts of speech such as prepositions, articles, adjectives, and others. What Is a Nominal? As a grammatical category, nominal describes words or groups of words that function together as a noun. The words in a nominal grouping give more detail about the noun (the headword), making it specific. Nominal phrases and clauses can include other parts of speech such as articles, prepositions, and adjectives. For example, in the noun phrase  a nice cup of tea, it makes sense to say that  nice  is a modifier of a  cup of tea, rather than just the  head  noun  cup, says Author Geoffrey Leech in A Glossary of Grammar. In this phase, nice cup of tea is a nominal; it provides more description than simply saying cup. Using a nominal gives the reader a more complete sense about what the writer is trying to convey. Nominal Phrases When constructing a nominal phrase, the headword for the phrase is a noun or pronoun, though it may not always be at the front of the phrase, as you would  think from just looking at the term. Headwords can have articles, pronouns, adjectives, or even other phrases before them, and they may be followed by prepositional phrases, subordinate clauses, and more. Author G. David Morley gives these examples of nominal phrases. The headwords are in italics. This Russian courseMy most enjoyable climbHer sisters new bicycleAll of our recent holidaysA voice from the pastThe song that Jill sangThe secretary general In all of these examples, the nominal gives more context to the noun. Its not just a course; its this Russian course. Its more than just a climb; it was my most enjoyable climb. And, its much more than just a bicycle; its her sisters new bicycle. To illustrate how nominals can function in a sentence just like nouns, here are ways to use the attorney general as a nominal phrase in different parts of the sentence: The attorney general is running for reelection. (Its the subject.)We took our concerns to the attorney general. (Its the indirect object.)A bulletproof limo took the attorney general to the conference. (Its the direct object.)The staff members went to lunch with the attorney general. (Its the object of a preposition.) Authors have made great use of nominal phrases in literature. For example, using a version of the nominal phrase from the last section, authors Greg Mortenson and David Oliver Relin authored a book called Three Cups of Tea: One Mans Mission to Promote Peace — One School at a Time. The book is about one mans quest to promote peace by sharing three cups of tea (together with thoughts of friendship and peace) with various individuals in Pakistan. In this title, Three Cups of Tea is the nominal phrase. Its not just a cup, but three cups of tea that Mortenson shared with others. Nominal Clauses Nominal clauses contain a verb and often begin with words such as what (or other wh- words) or that. These are called that- clauses and wh-  clauses  or relative clauses. Consider, for example, the sentence He can go  wherever he wants. The clause starts with a wh- word, contains a verb, and functions, taken whole, as a noun. You can tell it functions as a noun because you could replace it with a noun or a pronoun. For example, you could say, He can go home, He can go to Paris, or He can go there.   Because the wh- clause doesnt have a headword, its called a  free (nominal) relative clause.   Nominal clauses are dependent clauses. They cannot stand alone as a sentence but do contain a verb. I believe that grammar is easier than it seems. (The noun clause acts as an object, as in I believe it.)What I had for lunch was delicious. (The noun clause acts as a subject, as in The soup was delicious.)Beth is whom I was referring to. (The clause acts in this sentence as a predicate nominative. First, its a wh- clause because it has a subject and a verb. Next, it follows a linking verb. Third, it fills in information about the subject, as in Beth is she or She is Beth.) Nominalization The act of creating a nominal from a verb, adjective, or  other words  (even another noun) is known as  nominalization. For example, take  blogosphere. Its a new noun created from another plus the addition of a suffix. Its easy to create nouns (nominals) in English from other words. Even just adding  -ing  to a verb to make a  gerund  is nominalization, such as  firing  from  fire.  Or adding a suffix to an adjective, such as adding -ness  to  lovely  to make  loveliness.   Source Mortenson, Greg. Three Cups of Tea: One Mans Mission to Promote Peace — One School at a Time. David Oliver Relin, Paperback, Penguin Books, January 30, 2007.